ARINSIDER
Unmatched
Insight for Industry Analyst Relations
Professionals
March 9 2005, Release
4.04
You are receiving
this e-mail update on important developments in the field of
Industry Analyst Relations as a service from the Knowledge
Capital Group - KCG. If you do not wish to receive future
updates from us please follow
this link.
In this
Issue:
AR Insider:
The Rest of the
Story
The Insider:
Integrating Competitive Intelligence,
AR, and Sales: Best Practices - Part I
Under the
Influence: The Basics of Good
AR
Need help with your
Gartner/Meta contract?
Every
year KCG helps dozens of client companies increase
the value they get from their analyst subscriptions.
This is more true than ever when you merge two
analyst firms and their contracts -
- Are
you paying the lowest amount for the services you
buy? – what do other companies pay?
- Are
you spending money with the right firms and in the
right proportions? – who wields the influence in
your markets and who do they work for?
- Are
all your internal users happy? – how do the most
successful vendors reconcile research and
influence?
To find
out more about our programs and to understand
typical time lines and savings - contact me now.
Stephen England (512) 334 5943 or England@knowledgecap.com |
AR Insider: The Rest of the
Story
By: William S. Hopkins
Gartner’s
acquisition of Meta has cast a shadow over the analyst
marketplace. It is so easy to get caught up in drama and
suspense of the big boys at play. Don’t miss out
on the other stuff though. We think although there is no
doubt that it is THE news in the marketplace, that there are
of lot of other interesting things going on as
well. So, to catch up on the last few months and
in my best Paul Harvey… Here’s the rest of the
story.
Walking
Point
We recently
caught up with Tony Friscia, the CEO and one of the founders
of preeminent Point Player AMR Research to hear how the last
year went and see where they are headed in the
future. Tony reports that their revenues were
virtually flat at nearly $40 million last year, and that they
are starting to move the needle on their end-user vs. vendor
business back towards the buyers.
As for the
future? AMR is committed to its independence and feels
that they have a real opportunity to differentiate themselves
on service and a continued focus on the enterprise apps
space. As we have said before, we think that firms like
AMR, Ovum, Tower, etc. are well poised to take advantage of
the vacuum created by Meta’s absorption. We think we’ll
start to see some more direct competition vs. Gartner
soon.
We found Tony at
AMR’s excellent, vendor only event, Strategy 21 that
was held recently in the Bay Area. For enterprise
software and services vendors this remains the best event out
there when it comes to useable, actionable information about
where the marketplace and your competitors are going.
They are planning to take their success in vendor facing
events and to re focus it with an entirely new event this fall
that is oriented to end users. Should be interesting to
see how they do.
Metamorphosis:
Wake or just a ripple?
Last week, we
also attended Meta’s Metamorphosis event in Downtown San
Francisco. I’ll have to admit that I went expecting a
wake and ended up at a party. The general mood was not
nearly as bleak as we expected. Yeah, there were some
issues: there seemed to be a lot more vendors than end-users;
there were still an alarming number of analysts handing out
resumes like Halloween candy and the vendor expo was weaker
than we remembered. But hey, all of these things didn’t
conspire to take away from the overall festive
atmosphere. The Meta execs seemed relaxed and all of our
clients were overjoyed at the much lower level of sales rep
pressure.
By far the most
significant thing to happen at Metamorphosis was the
appearance of Gartner’s CEO, Gene Hall and their popular head
of Research, Peter Sondergaard. We think that this was a
smart move on Gartner’s part. What better way to say “we love
you” to the best clients of your newest acquisition?
Send them flowers?
They’re
Baaaack. Return of the Analysts For Hire?
After the closing
of the doors of Hurwitz in the fall of 2002 and the
cold-turkey dropping of the “we know what we are, we’re just
arguing over the price” stance of Aberdeen as of January 2004,
many vendors were left scrambling to find sources for
whitepapers for hire and other outsourced marketing collateral
production activities. Take heart all you
lamenting the demise of the Analysts for Hire. We don’t
know for sure, but it looks like demand is finally jump
starting supply.
Hurwitz
Redux - We were notified in early January that
financially challenged Baroudi Bloor was merging with formerly
bankrupt Hurwitz Group and that the new company would go forth
as Hurwitz Group. Well, an inauspicious beginning,
but who knows? If the demand is there, they could make
real money. The resilience of the players in the AFH space is
amazing.
Datamonitor
Buys Butler – Butler, long a mainstay of the UK AFH
marketplace, was purchased by UK based market research firm
Datamonitor in December. Though this deal was largely
overshadowed by the similarly timed Gartner/Meta deal, the
impact on the UK and European marketplace is
significant. Though neither company does much business
in North America, and Datamonitor is a market research firm,
not an AFH, we think that the addition of the more
“consultative” and directly vendor friendly business of Butler
with the Datamonitor sales and marketing machine will be a
win.
Got any news to
share? Heard anything interesting in the world of
AR? Give me a call at 512.334.5927 or email me at whopkins@knowledgecap.com
and let us know.
Return to
Top
Become a Certified Industry Analyst Relations
Professional!
The only
industry recognized seminar and accreditation program
for Analyst Relations professionals. The "Working
with the Analysts" seminar series offers a one day
program to become a Certified Industry Analyst
Relations Professional.
Full
time members of Analyst Relations teams and marketing
professionals will learn the latest best practices,
analyst firm taxonomy and interaction techniques.
Includes a 150+ page book of valuable and actionable
advice.
Dates
and venues:
❑
March 31 -- Palo Alto
❑
April 14 -- Paris
France
❑
April 28 -- Boston
❑
May 15 -- San Francisco
❑
May 26 -- Austin
http://www.knowledgecap.com/ARSeminars.htm
Contact
Terry Stephenson now for a registration form at tstephenson@knowledgecap.com
or
(512)334-5941 |
The Insider:
Integrating Competitive Intelligence, Analyst Relations, and
Sales: Best Practices - Part I of II
By:
Christopher R.
Wilder
In this series we
will look at the 7 best practices to integrate CI, AR and
Sales. In Part 1 we will look at how you can get the best of
both worlds from CI and AR with or without a full time CI
analyst. In the final part we will look at how these two
worlds can be integrated with sales.
Introduction
Your sales force
needs competitive tools in the sales cycle that
-
distinguish your company from its main
competitors and
-
are not too complex.
Unfortunately,
most research from analyst firms tends to be dry, complicated
and many times just plain wrong. In many organizations, the
task of distilling this information into quick charts and
graphs that will arm the sales force with weapons without
confusion over how to use them comes under the aegis of
Analyst Relations. Why?
Usually, the AR
Manager is responsible for negotiating analyst contracts,
building relationships, and maintaining passwords for the
research. As a result, it is a natural assumption that Analyst
Relations can handle the additional work of not only reading
research on a daily basis, but turning it into white papers,
power points and case studies for the sales force.
As an Analyst
Relations Manager, you handle three aspects of analyst firm
subscriptions (negotiation, maintenance, and renewal);
coordinate meetings for inquiries, briefings and tours; fill
out RFIs on a weekly basis; develop metrics to justify your
budget; organize participation in analyst conferences; send
out a monthly analyst e-newsletter; and supervise
international analyst activity as well.
Does this
scenario sound familiar?
The sales force
has always contacted you when it needs certain research
immediately. Just yesterday, a salesperson e-mailed you and
said that a ranking in a firm’s research has caused the
prospect to lean more to your competitor. This message is
similar to the other four you have received about the very
same ranking. You have contacted the analyst firm for an
explanation of how it arrived at the conclusion, but you have
not yet received a response. You, too, believe the report is
not accurate, but the process of educating the analyst is a
lengthy, arduous and in most cases unchangeable process.
Further, the VP of Sales contacts you wondering when this poor
rating will be changed. You then start the internal
battle of telling them that you have no control over the
rankings, that they are often subjective and that your company
did everything it was supposed to do: purchase of subscription
to get on analyst’s “database radar,” regular briefings over
the phone, bi-yearly tours and visits to the firm’s main
conference.
However, when
that research does not necessarily “glow” about your company,
then complaints arise. It is not your job to alter research to
suit the needs of your salespeople. The best you can do is
save them time by presenting confusing information in a clear,
condensed format. Even so, no one seems to be elated with your
efforts, especially when the research is not so flattering to
your company. Instead of hearing,” Thanks for warning us about
how we are perceived,” it becomes “Kill the
messenger.”
Who decided that
just because you manage the passwords that you are also
responsible for competitive intelligence? Usually, Analyst
Relations handles this job out of convenience and habit. No
one in your company ever established a plan for how research
is disseminated to the sales force. To compound this some
salespeople create their own tools; some rely on AR for
distilled research charts; some use nothing at all.
Nevertheless, when a deal is on the line, salespeople will
look to you to rescue them. If you cannot, they will blame
you.
A trend we have
seen within savvy companies is the creation of the Competitive
Intelligence Analyst (CIA) position that works with AR and the
sales force—and is responsible solely for the creation of
necessary tools. Saddling Analyst Relations with a job that
should involve a separate resource only diminishes AR’s
capability to build relationships and educate analysts
effectively. A CIA that focuses only on competition and the
development of tools can deliver results quicker to needy
salespeople. Most organizations simply do not have the time to
build comprehensive sales tools so we recommend having CIA
report to the Director of Analyst Relations. This way, one can
concentrate on internal sales needs (CIA) and the other can
manage the external world of analysts (AR).
While many
companies have dedicated market intelligence, groups the
position of CIA is one that is becoming more and more of a
tactical need, especially as IAR becomes strategic in the
sales process. If considering developing this position
in your organization below is a list of best practices for you
to consider:
Hire a
Dedicated Competitive Intelligence Analyst (CIA): If
budget issues preclude you from acquiring this resource, think
about sharing the cost from different departments—Sales and
Analyst Relations.
If you cannot
afford a CIA, then establish internally what AR can and cannot
do for the sales force: Provide expectations about the
level of competitive intelligence you can achieve, given AR’s
other duties and limited time.
Combing
analyst websites for research relating to your company takes
time: Having a dedicated person to perform this task is
invaluable; especially when that person can also turn the
information into tools that better your company’s sales
cycle.
In the next issue
we will look at:
-
Transformation
of analytical research into viable sales tools
-
Analyst
Relations as a logistical department
-
Never outsource
or farm-out your Competitive Intelligence
-
Measuring Where
you Are and Building Outward
If you have question or
comments on vendor briefings, please give us a call at
512.334.5943 or email us at inquiry@knowledgecap.com.
We’ll be happy to talk.
Return to
Top
Measure your AR Progress in
2005
Most
successful AR teams measure some aspect of their AR
program at least once a quarter.
KCG
Coverage Metrics are simple, affordable tracking
studies that let you:
- Benchmark your programs versus that of your
key competitors
- Measure how much you “move the needle” next
year
- Focus
on the key analysts that have a less than perfect
view of your strategy
- Measure analyst coverage at firms you don’t
subscribe to
http://www.knowledgecap.com/solutions/CoverageMetrics.htm
To find
out more about our programs and to see actual
sanitized sample reports contact me now. Stephen
England (512) 334 5943 or England@knowledgecap.com |
Under the
Influence: The Basics of Good Analyst Relations (Part
I)
By: Stephen F. England
In this, the
first of a three part series, we are going to look at the
basic eight steps to a good AR program. The first two articles
are based on the KCG Webinar – AR Basics - given every month
online. The third is based on the best practices advice we
give every day when asked – what kind of budget and headcount
does an AR program take?
The eight steps
are:
- Target the right
analysts
- Spend money with the right
analyst firms
- Build a contact strategy and
plan
- Nominate an interactor
team
- Arm them with the best
presentations
- Train them in analyst
interactions
- Integrate AR with the sales
force
- Measure the results of the
program
When it comes to
targeting the right analysts we have to talk first
about aligning your AR program with what you sell and who you
sell it to.
Think of it this
way, by putting your product or service offering down the left
hand side of a matrix and your target markets (verticals or
geographically) across the top you create a grid. Each column,
row or sometimes even individual cells that contain
significant target revenue we call an initiative. Each
initiative needs AR “air cover” to be successful.
And for each
initiative you need to know exactly which key individual
analysts are getting the buyer’s attention and fielding their
inquiry calls.
Not only do those
list tell you where to spend your time on outreach they also
tell you how to spend money with the right analyst
firms. By starting in the “bottom up” fashion you get a
precise measure of which analyst firms you need to subscribe
to and even a measure of how much to spend with each as a
proportion of your total budget.
Remember you may
get to brief analysts for a while for free but if you really
want control over your relationship, sooner or later you will
need to pay to play.
In order to
build a contact strategy and plan you need to start with
those things you can predict – launches, announcements,
M&A etc and build a “little and often” contact plan for
your key analysts. Remember it is better to have regular
contact with 3 analysts that matter than annual briefings with
30 that don’t. Once you have the basic plan in place stick to
it religiously and make sure that every positive event and
customer win is fed to the analysts promptly.
To do this you’re
going to need to nominate an interactor team – for each
initiative you’ll need 2-3 trained spokespeople who can
support your interaction plan. For the “big picture” you’ll
need C level “interactors” but you’ll also need product
management folks for the more detailed pitch and – for the
really hard questions – think about adding one or two pre
sales “engineers” who really know the field.
In the next AR
Insider we’ll look at how to “arm” and train this team, how to
link the whole program to the sales function and finally how
to measure how it’s working.
If you’d like
to discuss any of the points above or add anything please
contact me Stephen England (england@knowledgecap.com
or 512-334-5943) or use our small company “blog” at http://kcgblog.blogspot.com/
Return to
Top
KCG Introduces
three new BLOGS for AR
Professionals
In
response to popular demand KCG has set up a number of
web forums or BLOGS for AR Professionals.
Current
subjects include:
-
The Gartner/Meta Merger
-
Small Company AR
-
Big Company AR
We hope
to see many more streams and posting as this resource
develops. Fell free to visit the KCG BLOGS
at:
http://kcgblog.blogspot.com/
or e-mail weblog@knowledgecap.com
|
About KCG:
The Knowledge Capital Group,
Inc. (KCG) is the leading global Analyst Relations Strategy
consultancy with extensive domain expertise in
Telecommunications, Enterprise Software, Hardware and
Networking. KCG helps technology companies leverage the
industry analyst's influence with end user customers and
prospects to increase sales. KCG’s 500+ client list
includes: AT&T Wireless; BMC Software; Cisco; Great Plains
Software; Hewlett Packard; HNC Software; IBM (Lotus and
Tivoli); Microsoft; Motorola; Neon Systems; New York Times,
Nextel, Nortel; Novell; Oracle; Peoplesoft; SAP, SAS
Institute; Siebel; Sprint; Trilogy; Verizon and
Vignette
The AR Insider Staff:
William S. Hopkins, Executive
Editor
Christopher R. Wilder,
Publisher
Stephen England, Contributing
Editor
Terry Stephenson, Editorial
Review
AR Insider is a bi-weekly publication of the Knowledge
Capital Group, Inc., The global leaders in Industry Analyst
Relations strategies for technology
vendors.
The Knowledge Capital Group,
Inc.
720 Brazos Suite 1013
Austin, TX 78701
512.334.5920
Web: www.knowledgecap.com
email: arinsider@knowledgecap.com
The contents of this publication represent the opinion
of the Knowledge Capital Group. We encourage you to
forward the publication to other colleagues that you think
might benefit from the content herein. Print and electronic
reproduction of selected articles or elements of this document
is also encouraged, but only with the expressed written
consent of the Knowledge Capital Group
The Knowledge Capital
Group values your online privacy and does not believe in
spamming. You are receiving this email because you have
requested to receive information about the Knowledge Capital
Group, or your e-mail was provided to us by a company who
believed you wished to receive information from other
companies. If you wish to opt-out of any future e-mails from
us, please follow
this link. |